|
Summary
Identification of the agent
Serological tests
Requirements for vaccines and diagnostic
biologicals
|
|
Text on foot-and-mouth disease from the Office International
des Epizooties, Manual of Standards for Diagnostic Tests and Vaccines,
(2000), Chapter 2.1.1.
This text is included in its entirety. The manual describes in general
terms the 'prescribed' and 'alternative' diagnostic tests for FMD. 'Prescribed'
tests are those that are required by the International Animal Health Code
for the testing of animals before they are moved internationally. 'Alternative'
tests are those that are suitable for the diagnosis of disease within
a local setting, and can also be used in the import/export of animals
after bilateral agreement.
More detailed descriptions of the actual procedures followed at the OIE/FAO
WRL for FMD are given in the 'Laboratory Tests' section of this module.
FOOT AND MOUTH DISEASE
Summary
Foot-and-mouth disease (FMD) is the most contagious disease of animals
and has a great potential for causing heavy loss in susceptible cloven-hoofed
animals. There are seven serotypes of FMD virus, namely, O, A, C, SAT1,
SAT2, SAT3 and Asia 1. Infection with one serotype does not confer immunity
against another. FMD cannot be differentiated clinically from other vesicular
diseases, including swine vesicular disease, vesicular stomatitis and
vesicular exanthema. Laboratory diagnosis of any suspected FMD case is
therefore a matter of urgency.
Typical cases of FMD are characterised by a vesicular condition of the
feet, buccal mucosa and, in females, the mammary glands. Clinical signs
can vary from mild to severe and fatalities may occur, especially in young
animals. In some species the infection may usually be subclinical, e.g.
African buffalo (Syncerus caffer). The preferred tissue for diagnosis
is epithelium from unruptured or freshly ruptured vesicles. Where this
is not possible, blood and/or oesophageal-pharyngeal fluid samples taken
by probang cup in ruminants, or throat swabs from pigs provide an alternative
source of virus. Myocardial tissue or blood can be submitted from fatal
cases, but vesicles are again preferable if present.
It is vital that samples from suspected cases be transported under secure
conditions and according to international regulations. They should only
be dispatched to authorised laboratories.
Diagnosis of FMD is by the demonstration of FMD viral antigen or nucleic
acid in samples of tissue or fluid. Detection of specific humoral antibody
can also be used for diagnosis, especially in wildlife, but this requires
the absence of any history of vaccination, as it is not always possible
to differentiate a serological response to natural infection from that
due to vaccination. Diagnosis based on serological response may also be
problematical in endemic areas due to the possibility of previous infection.
Identification of the agent: The demonstration
of FMD viral antigen is sufficient for a positive diagnosis.
Complement fixation (CF) has been the traditional test for diagnosis,
but has been replaced in many laboratories by the enzyme-linked immunosorbent
assay (ELISA), as this is more specific and sensitive and is not affected
by pro- or anti-complementary factors. If the sample is inadequate or
the test result inconclusive, it will be necessary to grow the virus in
cell cultures or in 2-7-day old unweaned mice. The cultures should preferably
be of primary bovine thyroid, but pig, lamb or calf kidney cells, or cell
lines of comparable sensitivity may be used. When a cytopathic effect
(CPE) appears in the cultures, the fluids can be used in CF tests or ELISAs.
Similar tests can be performed on homogenised suspensions of the dissected
musculo-skeletal tissues of any mice that die. In the absence of CPE or
any dead mice, a further passage should be made at a 48-hour interval,
with freeze/thawing of the cells, before the sample is declared to be
negative.
Nucleic acid recognition tests, such as the polymerase chain reaction
and in situ hybridisation, are being used increasingly as rapid and sensitive
diagnostic methods. Electron microscopic examination of lesion material
is sometimes useful to differentiate FMD from disease caused by pox or
other viruses.
Serological tests: The demonstration of specific
antibody titres in non-vaccinated animals, where a vesicular condition
is present, is sufficient for a positive diagnosis. This is useful in
mild cases or where epithelial tissue cannot be collected.
Virus neutralisation (VN) tests and ELISA are used as serotype-specific
serological tests. VN tests depend on tissue cultures and are, therefore,
more prone to variability than ELISA; they are also slower and subject
to contamination. ELISAs for antibodies have the advantage of being faster
and are not dependent on cell cultures. The ELISA might be performed with
inactivated antigens, thus requiring less restrictive biocontainment facilities.
Requirements for vaccines and diagnostic biologicals:
Inactivated virus vaccines of varying composition are available commercially.
Typically, virus is used to infect a suspension or monolayer cell culture
and the resulting preparation is clarified, inactivated with ethyleneimine
and blended with adjuvant. Many FMD vaccines are multivalent to provide
cover against the different serotypes likely to be encountered in a given
field situation.
The finished vaccine must be shown to be free from residual live virus.
This is usually done using a combination of in-vitro tests on the inactivated
virus preparation and in-vivo tests on the finished vaccine. Challenge
tests are also conducted in vaccinated cattle to establish a PD50
(50% protective dose) value, although a serological test is considered
to be satisfactory where the vaccine producer has established a statistically
significant correlation between protection and specific antibody response.
Diagnostic and reference reagents are available from the OIE/FAO (Food
and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations)
World Reference Laboratory for FMD
Pirbright Laboratory
Ash Road
Pirbright
Woking
Surrey
GU24 ONF
United Kingdom
or from Regional Reference Laboratories for FMD.
|