Main Menu Map Glossary Tools Search Help AVIS Return to AleffGroup website

Foot and mouth disease: Control

Future Control

Contents

 

Production problems, the risk of live virus release, poor inactivation, antigen instability and the lack of cross-serotype protection of inactivated whole virus vaccines have led to the pursuit of a more stable heterotypic bioengineered vaccine, based on the inclusion of immunogenic peptides derived from FMDV genome sequences.

Such vaccines have the potential to act as markers with companion differential diagnostic tests for use during eradication programmes. However, for developing countries, the technology required for recombinant virus production may be as prohibitive as the maintenance of high-containment facilities for the manipulation of live FMDV.

In the last 20 years there has been considerable effort directed towards the production of synthetic or sub-unit FMDV vaccines based on the major immunogenic sites of the virus. However, no commercial bio-engineered vaccine against FMD has been forthcoming, despite encouraging early work with VP1 produced by recombinant DNA technology and expression as a fusion protein (Kleid et al., 1981). Synthetic peptides based upon the antigenic sites of VP1 were shown to induce neutralising antibody and protection in laboratory animals when conjugated with carrier proteins (Bittle et al., 1982), polymerised (Pfaff et al., 1982) or used as high payload free peptide in Freund's adjuvant (Doel et al., 1990). Modified-live viral (Kitson et al., 1991) and bacterial (Ruppert et al., 1994) vectors able to express the immunogenic sites of FMDV have also been developed with some success, and enhanced immunogenicity has also been shown with FMDV peptides as fusion products in hepatitis B core particles (Clarke et al., 1987).

In most instances the induction of protection by synthetic peptide FMDV vaccines in natural host species has been disappointing (DiMarchi et al., 1986) compared with the earlier results from guinea pig studies. It has been shown that the humoral response in cattle immunised with free FMDV peptide vaccines was of relatively low avidity (Steward et al., 1991) and high IgG2 titre (Mulcahy et al., 1990) compared with the response in conventionally vaccinated cattle. There is evidence to suggest that even in an outbred group of cattle MHC polymorphism may have a significant influence upon the efficiency of T cell epitope presentation (van Lierop et al., 1995). However, larger, more complex antigens with multiple B and T cell epitopes may represent a better option. Recent results have shown that processed FMDV capsid precursor protein P1 (Grubman et al., 1993) can be expressed in vitro and can induce protection in pigs. Work currently underway at the Institute for Animal Health, Pirbright, has identified epitopes on the structural and non-structural proteins which are important in generating both B and T cell responses. Complex constructs incorporating both types of epitope are being evaluated for their ability to protect against challenge. This approach of understanding more precisely which determinants of the virus are immunogenic and which are protective offers the best chance of developing an effective sub-unit vaccine.

In recent years our understanding of the molecular basis of many of the functions and properties of FMD virus has much improved. Using attenuated FMD viruses as vaccines became discredited in the past due to reversion to virulence in the field. The genetic determinants of virulence are now understood for many picornaviruses at the molecular level. For FMD, several regions of the genome are associated with virulence, particularly the viral non-structural proteins (Giraudo et al., 1990; Almeida et al., 1998). A better understanding of how virulence can be altered by direct manipulation of the genome offers the prospect of developing vaccine strains with multiple, specific mutations which are much less likely to revert to virulence on passage in animals. Early results are promising (Almeida et al., 1998) but it will be several years before it is known whether or not this approach offers a realistic prospect of developing useable vaccines.

A second aspect of the biology of FMD virus that is now better understood is the molecular basis of the cellular receptors to which the virus binds and the corresponding receptor-binding sites on the virus. An important receptor has long been known to be the 'RGD' sequence which is conserved across all strains of FMD virus on the major immunogenic GH loop of VP1 (Fox et al., 1989). Using recombinant techniques, viruses have been produced which lack this receptor and which consequently cannot replicate in vivo or in vitro. Animals vaccinated with the receptor-deleted viruses were protected against challenge (McKenna et al., 1996). If a way can be found to produce receptor-deleted viruses in bulk, they would represent a safer option than current vaccines as there would be no risk of the vaccine causing the disease it is intended to protect against. However, FMD virus possesses at least two receptors, the second being a heparan sulphate receptor which is apparently of particular importance in strains adapted to tissue-culture (Jackson et al., 1996). The relevance of this to the potential use of RGD-deleted viruses as vaccines is not yet clear. A better understanding of the interaction between virus and host offers the prospect not only of designing vaccine viruses which are incapable of causing disease but also of developing therapeutic antiviral agents that are capable of preventing or eliminating infection completely.

Advances in molecular biology make it likely that better and safer vaccines and/or antiviral agents against FMD will be developed in the future. For the present, control of FMD can be achieved by the effective use of currently available vaccines provided they are combined with the other zoosanitary measures described in this module.

   


© Copyright 2002, AVIS Consortium. All Rights Reserved.